<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SEO Speedwagon</title>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/</link>
<description>Intrapromote Looks Under the Hood of Search Engine Optimization</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:31:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>DMOZ, Meet Wikipedia</title>
<author>Tom Lustina</author>
<description>I must say, I find DMOZ and Wikipedia incredibly interesting. Both can be incredibly helpful resources, as manifested by Google&apos;s love affair with each, a love affair that makes DMOZ and Wikipedia necessarily difficult to crack. Yet, as just a...</description>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2008/06/dmoz_meet_wikip.html</link>
<guid>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2008/06/dmoz_meet_wikip.html</guid>
<category>Wikipedia</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:31:20 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DMOZ Just Won&apos;t Die</title>
<author>Sean Bolton</author>
<description>According to the DMOZ site, they started editing again according to a bolded red section of their site just above their search box prompting people to log in for more information. Something tells me this weak glimmer of hope isn&apos;t...</description>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2007/01/dmoz_just_wont.html</link>
<guid>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2007/01/dmoz_just_wont.html</guid>
<category>DMOZ</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:36:29 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DMOZ, Please Die Already</title>
<author>Sean Bolton</author>
<description>I canâ€™t count how many clients Iâ€™ve submitted to DMOZ that were never even reviewed. Granted, I only manage a handful of accounts each year, but Iâ€™m not the only one fed up with DMOZâ€™s lack of editorial attentiveness. Ask any SEO about their experience with DMOZ review and approval experience and youâ€™ll see a crazy glaze come over their face like someone just stole their lunch.</description>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/12/dmoz_please_die.html</link>
<guid>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/12/dmoz_please_die.html</guid>
<category>DMOZ</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:42:49 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NOODP:  Should Google Have Kept Greasing Wheezer?</title>
<author>Doug Ausbury</author>
<description>Iâ€™m wondering if Google should have stayed inside and greased Wheezer a while longer before adding support for the NOODP tag.</description>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/08/noodp_should_go_1.html</link>
<guid>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/08/noodp_should_go_1.html</guid>
<category>Google</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:15:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How About One More Solid, Danny Sullivan?</title>
<author>Tom Lustina</author>
<description>As we recently celebrated the liberation of the results page from ODP oppression, I couldn&apos;t help but think of a lesser publicized instance of serp injustice.  Of course, I am speaking of the tyranny that is being carried out upon Yahoo results by . . . you guessed it . . .Yahoo!  </description>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/07/how_about_one_m.html</link>
<guid>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/07/how_about_one_m.html</guid>
<category>Yahoo</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:24:42 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NOODP = Yes!!!</title>
<author>Doug Ausbury</author>
<description>Last Thursday, our fair-haired and highly regarded Erik Dafforn sent the Intrapromote staff an email with a Subject line that all IPers (Intrapromote staff) assumed was a bad joke.  The subject line you ask? â€œGoogle now honors NOODP meta tag!â€?</description>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/07/noodp_yes.html</link>
<guid>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/07/noodp_yes.html</guid>
<category>DMOZ</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:46:26 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>If the Brady Bunch Were a Links Page . . .</title>
<author>Tom Lustina</author>
<description>What did the Brady Bunch teach us about link building?  How does a links page jump the shark?</description>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/03/if_the_brady_bu.html</link>
<guid>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/03/if_the_brady_bu.html</guid>
<category>Link Building</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:38:19 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DMOZ: Hard to Get Into, Harder to Escape</title>
<author>Erik Dafforn</author>
<description>A thread at Resource Zone details one man&apos;s efforts in trying to get his site removed from the Open Directory Project (DMOZ). Short of turning his site into an illegal operation, he found his efforts futile and eventually settled for a modified description.</description>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2005/11/dmoz_hard_to_ge.html</link>
<guid>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2005/11/dmoz_hard_to_ge.html</guid>
<category>DMOZ</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:50:53 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nike, Google, and the DMOZ Description</title>
<author>Erik Dafforn</author>
<description>In scoping out a site redesign, a client asked me to take a look at a Google query for &quot;Nike&quot; - specifically to determine how Google was creating this descriptive text: Apparel, shoes and accessories. This client is pretty search-savvy,...</description>
<link>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2005/08/nike_google_and.html</link>
<guid>http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2005/08/nike_google_and.html</guid>
<category>Google</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:27:32 -0500</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>