« DMOZ, Meet Wikipedia | Main | Javascript Redirects = Risky Business »

Exactly How Accurate IS Google Trends for Websites?

June 27, 2008

Erik Dafforn

Much has been made of the week-old announcement that Google is in the traffic trending game. I weighed in earlier this week at ClickZ, focusing mostly on ways you can benefit from the information and largely sidestepping the already-trodden issues of Google being the only company able to opt out of the reporting, etc.

One question that hasn't been discussed to death, however, is the actual accuracy of the traffic numbers that Google is reporting. I ran some numbers on some sample sites and laid the Google Trends lines over the actual traffic numbers:

Example 1:
google-trends-traffic-overlay-01.jpg

Example 2:
google-trends-traffic-overlay-02.jpg

The verdict? In general, Google doesn't do too awfully bad, especially considering that neither of the sites above use Google Analytics or Urchin to measure their traffic.

The peaks and valleys are roughly similar. Roughly. Yet the scale is off pretty dramatically, with Google underreporting the traffic on one of the sites by a factor of two.

So my recommendation is that to gauge large trends (seasonality, results of large offline campaigns, etc.), Google Trends is a decent first look. It's probably a safe bet that when you plot two sites within the same vertical, that their relative lines will be more or less accurate when contrasted. But don't trust it for raw numbers.

Just to be fair, Google never said it was 100% accurate, stating in the post that "because data is estimated and aggregated over a variety of sources, it may not match the other data sources you rely on for web traffic information."

All posts by Erik Dafforn
posted by Erik Dafforn at June 27, 2008 02:25 PM
Intrapromote: [ Case studies | SEO services | Bios ]

Printer-friendly version

Trackback Pings

To TrackBack this entry, use the following URL:
http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/mt-tb.cgi/552

Comments

I did the same comparison (real to Google estimates) and the two lines did not resemble each other in the least. And the absolute numbers were off by a factor of 3. The site is fairly large in terms of traffic - definitely not below the radar line.

Google Trends for Web Sites may some day be accurate enough to pay attention to, but for now it's not much better than random.

Posted by: Chris at August 16, 2008 03:54 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?


(you may use HTML tags for style)

Copyright 2005-2008 Intrapromote, LLC